KHROMA article in the US INSTYLE
The Kardashian sisters Kim, Khloe and one I don't know (I definitely have not keept up with the Kardashians so far...) plan to launch a cosmetics line named "KHROMA - BEAUTY AT ULTA" (whatever that means).
On one hand in my opinion KHROMA is not a very appealing name for a cosmetics line, it rather reminds me of CHROME and maybe a nice new micro-wave, or something like that.
On the other hand it is extravagant.
But the more important question is: What's up with the "K" and "H" combination?
Also calling your daughter KHLOE? Makes the name look KHLUMSY.. eeh CLUMSY, as if you didn't know how it's correctly spelled.
I already foresee people saying "YES, but there are enough KHLOES and it can be written like that!" Sure it can, but you could also write "Dschosefihn" which should sound a lot like "Josephine" but you don't, right?
Chloé vs. Khloe.
Hard decision..
I mean: it's not her fault (KardashMOM, what did you think?), but to keep it up with the KH even in their brands name? Maybe they want it to be their "statement name" (for everything now is a STATEMENT something... statement belt, statement earrings, statement bag...).
Now to the essential question: Would you try their cosmetics?
My answer is: I don't know, for I do not even know what they will be offering.
Some people commented harshly under the U.S. INSTYLE post on facebook
"No." "HELL NO!" or "as if they need more money"
I doubt that it has occured to them, that also the houses of CHANEL, DIOR, YSL (...) surely do not "need more money", but we still buy their products, don't we?
Depending on the quality and price of their products, why not give it a shot!
If they should release a nailpolish or whatever which I simply fall in love with neither the "KH" nor the unattractive name (you decide which name I mean), nor my ignorance of the Kardashians will stop me from buying it, or will tempt me to boycott their products.
Don't be childish, people!
I already see you standing in line at the cashier for you could not resist.
Biz
